Expanding the Edge of Chaos: Leading Through AI, Ethics, and Emerging Expectations – A Leadership Call to Action – Part Nine
David Nichols – Co-Founder and Executive Director of the DVMS Institute
From the Organization to the Supply Web
In Part Eight, we examined how the boundary of chaos is expanding into new areas, including artificial intelligence, digital ethics, stakeholder trust, and societal expectations. We found that leading at the edge requires more than intuition; it demands transparency into interdependencies and the bravery to bridge cultural gaps.
In Part Nine, the focus shifts to supply webs — the complex, interconnected networks that support modern economies. I’ll use the full term “edge of chaos” throughout, but as in earlier sections, I’ll sometimes abbreviate it to “the edge” for simplicity.
Supply chains are no longer linear. They have evolved into supply webs: extensive, flexible, and interconnected worldwide. In these webs, efficiency and vulnerability are two sides of the same coin. A disruption at one point can spread unpredictably across the entire system. As we saw during the COVID-19 pandemic, for leaders, the key takeaway is that resilience can no longer depend solely on contracts, assumptions, or redundancy. Instead, it must be built on containment and evidence-based relationships.
Containment involves limiting risk through proof rather than promises. Evidence-based relationships require suppliers to demonstrate their capabilities under pressure. This paper examines how leaders at the edge of chaos create, maintain, and scale supply web resilience in an environment where disruption is unavoidable.
The Edge of Chaos in Global Supply Webs
The old metaphor of a supply “chain” implied linearity and predictability. That metaphor no longer fits. Today’s supply webs are multidimensional systems, with overlapping relationships, shared dependencies, and global exposure. They are optimized for efficiency but vulnerable to disruption.
In such webs, leadership is tested not by routine operations but by shocks: a factory fire in Asia that halts production in Europe; a cyberattack on a logistics provider that impacts healthcare; or a geopolitical conflict that transforms entire industries overnight. Each event uncovers the same truth: the edge of chaos in supply webs is where stability and adaptability must coexist.
The DVMS approach redefines supply web resilience as a leadership challenge. Leaders must coordinate value, risk, and culture not only within their organizations but also across their networks of partners and suppliers. The question is not just whether goods flow, but whether the supply web can adapt without breaking under pressure.
Containment as the Strategic Imperative
Containment is the discipline of limiting risk through demonstrable evidence. In the DVMS sense, containment asks: Can this supplier prove, with evidence, that they can meet our needs under stress? It rejects vague assurances and demands verifiable capability.
Consider two organizations facing the same disruption. One believed it was resilient because it had multiple suppliers. Yet when disruption struck, it discovered those suppliers shared the same upstream vulnerabilities. Redundancy without containment proved to be an illusion.
The other organization viewed resilience as something supported by evidence rather than assumptions. Its leaders required suppliers to prove resilience through audited processes, recovery plans, and transparent performance data. When the disruption occurred, the gaps were already identified, and contingency plans were already in place. Instead of panicking, they managed the risk effectively.
Leadership’s role here is crucial. Containment doesn’t happen by luck; it depends on executives to set clear expectations, demand proof, and ensure partners are held responsible. They must treat resilience as a core part of creating value, not just an afterthought. Without firm leadership, containment risks turning into empty compliance gestures.
Evidence-Based Relationships in the Supply Web
Containment relies on transparency and evidence in relationships. Trust is essential, but blind trust doesn’t build resilience.
This is where culture becomes essential. Leaders must cultivate a culture where suppliers are expected — and rewarded — for providing clear evidence of their capabilities. Cultural behaviors that punish escalation or reward secrecy weaken resilience; those that promote transparency and learning strengthen it.
The Adaptive Edge Platform, guided by Kaia, the AI agent, helps leaders navigate this landscape. Kaia does not make decisions for them but serves as an advisor, highlighting the connections between leadership intent, structures, and behaviors. She can reveal, for example, when leadership rhetoric about transparency is undermined by contractual incentives that incentivize silence, or when cultural gaps prevent suppliers from surfacing risks.
Kaia also emphasizes the skills needed to maintain evidence-based relationships. Hard skills include supplier auditing, analytics, and regulatory literacy. Soft skills encompass diplomacy, empathy, and building trust across cultures. By highlighting these requirements, the Adaptive Edge Platform simplifies the complex systems matrix into a clear pathway that leaders can confidently follow.
The result is not just a more robust supply network but a stronger culture of partnership. Suppliers cease being vendors with contracts and begin to act as partners in resilience, tied not by promises but by evidence.
Patterns of Success and Failure at the Edge of Chaos
Across industries, patterns emerge.
Organizations that succeed in supply web resilience integrate containment and evidence-based relationships into their culture. Leaders demand demonstrable proof, incorporate transparency into governance, and embed trust into daily practices. These organizations view resilience not as a separate program but as a core aspect of how value is created and delivered.
Organizations that neglect to prioritize resilience treat it as a mere checklist. They depend on contracts and redundancy, trusting that backup suppliers will be enough. When disruption occurs, their failure to contain the problem becomes clear. Evidence was never required, gaps were never addressed, and trust crumbles exactly when it’s needed most.
Assimilation remains the key difference. In mergers, it meant enriching cultures. Supply webs involve integrating containment and evidence into core operations. When leaders assimilate resilience into their leadership style, supply webs adapt and recover. When they don’t, these webs fracture under pressure.
The Adaptive Edge Platform facilitates this understanding by revealing interdependencies that leaders might overlook. Kaia shows where leadership signals conflict with organizational structures, cultural behaviors oppose resilience objectives, and skill gaps leave vulnerabilities unaddressed. By making the unseen visible, Kaia enables leaders to shift from reactive improvisation to proactive orchestration at the edge of chaos.
Practical Tools for Executives
Part Nine must stay practical. Leaders should extend the Z-axis audit from Part Six into their supply networks by asking: Does our leadership intent match our structures and behaviors in supplier relationships? Where is there misalignment, and what needs to change?
The CPD Model also applies directly:
- Create: strategic partnerships that add value and strengthen resilience.
- Protect: insistence on containment and demonstrable evidence from suppliers.
- Deliver: sustained trust and performance across the web.
Asking these questions regularly simplifies the complex global supply network into a clear understanding.
The Adaptive Edge Platform enhances these practices by offering evidence-based visibility. Kaia does not provide solutions. Instead, she advises leaders by pointing out hidden dependencies, cultural gaps, and necessary skills. By simplifying the systems matrix into a straightforward path, Kaia turns the edge of chaos from a source of fear into a landscape that leaders can confidently navigate.
Toward a Global Paradigm
Part Nine has focused on supply webs, where the edge of chaos is felt most deeply. It has been demonstrated that containment and evidence-based relationships are not merely technical solutions, but essential leadership tools. Leaders who demand measurable resilience build webs capable of withstanding disruption and adapting to change. Those who depend on promises and redundancy tend to struggle.
But the edge of chaos continues to expand. Beyond supply webs lie global ecosystems, cross-border regulations, and interconnected societies where resilience and legitimacy are tested at a large scale. Part Ten will bring together all the aspects discussed in this series — culture, governance, resilience, AI, ethics, trust, societal expectations, and supply webs — into a worldwide leadership model.
Part Nine reminds us that leadership on the edge of chaos is not about predicting disruptions but about preparing for them through containment and evidence. It emphasizes demonstrating resilience rather than assuming it. It also involves leading supply webs not as chains of contracts but as ecosystems based on trust, accountability, and adaptive strength.
About the Author
Dave is the Executive Director of the DVMS Institute.
Dave spent his “formative years” on US Navy submarines. There, he learned complex systems, functioning in high-performance teams, and what it takes to be an exceptional leader. He took those skills into civilian life and built a successful career leading high-performance teams in software development and information service delivery.
DVMS Institute®
The DVMS Institute assists organizations in operationalizing the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (NISTCSF) by utilizing a Digital Value Management System® (DVMS) to transform it from a static compliance reference framework into a dynamic operating system of Governance, Resilience, and Assurance.
The DVMS Institute’s Accredited Publications and Certified Training Courses offer a structured pathway for mastering the integration of governance intent, operational execution, and assurance evidence, enabling organizations to demonstrate measurable resilience, regulatory alignment, and stakeholder confidence in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Download our Executive White Paper – The Assurance Mandate – Moving Beyond GRC to Evidence-Based Operational Resilience
Digital Value Management System® (DVMS)
A Digital Value Management System (DVMS) turns systemic cyber risk into operational resilience by uniting Fragmented Frameworks and Standards—such as NIST, ITSM, GRC, and ISO—into a single, adaptive Governance, Resilience, and Assurance (GRA) operating system that keeps your digital business running, no matter the disruption.
The DVMS doesn’t replace existing frameworks—it connects, contextualizes, and amplifies them, transforming compliance requirements into actionable intelligence that drives and ensures sustained digital operations and performance.
By adopting a DVMS, organizations are positioned to:
- Maintain Operational Stability Amidst Constant Digital Disruption
- Deliver Digital Value and Trust Across A Digital Ecosystem
- Satisfy Critical Regulatory and Certification Requirements
- Leverage Cyber Resilience as a Competitive Advantage
For the CEO, the DVMS provides a clear line of sight between digital operations, business performance, and strategic outcomes—turning governance and resilience into enablers of growth and innovation rather than cost centers.
For the Board of Directors, the DVMS provides ongoing assurance that the organization’s digital assets, operations, and ecosystem are governed, protected, and resilient—supported by evidence-based reporting that directly links operational integrity to enterprise value and stakeholder trust.
For the CIO, the DVMS provides a structured way to align technology investments and operations with measurable business outcomes.
For the CRO, the DVMS provides a way to embed risk and resilience directly into operational processes, turning risk management into a driver of performance and adaptability.
For the CISO, the DVMS provides a continuous assurance mechanism that demonstrates cyber resilience and digital trust across the enterprise and its supply chain.
For Internal and External Auditors, the DVMS provides verifiable proof that the enterprise can maintain operational continuity under stress.
DVMS Explainer Videos
- Architecture Video: David Moskowitz explains the DVMS System
- Case Study Video: Dr. Joseph Baugh Shares His DVMS Story.
- Overlay Model – What is an Overlay Model
- MVC ZX Model – Powers the CPD
- CPD Model – Powers DVMS Operations
- 3D Knowledge Model – Powers the DVMS Culture
- FastTrack Model – Enables A Phased DVMS Adoption
Digital Value Management System® is a registered trademark of the DVMS Institute LLC.
® DVMS Institute 2025 All Rights Reserved
